Clinical characterization of stomatitis cases with an epithelial growth factor receptor inhibitor in metastatic colorectal cancer patients: A study of 7 cases and literature review.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to report a case series of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) undergoing panitumumab-containing regimens affected by oral lesions and to review the current literature. STUDY DESIGN: Electronic medical records of mCRC patients referred to treat mouth sores during the treatment with the anti-epithelial growth factor receptor (EGFR)-panitumumab-were retrospectively reviewed. Patients' characterization, clinical profile of oral lesions, and management outcomes were documented. Additionally, modifications or discontinuation of the antineoplastic treatment as well as the occurrence of other adverse events (AEs) were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 7 patients were included. The oral lesions appeared in a median time of 10 days (range 7-11 days) after the drug administration. The median reported pain score was 5 (range 1-9), causing feeding discomfort. Oral lesions with a marked aphthous-like appearance, among others, occurred in all cases and involved nonkeratinized mucosa more likely. At least 1 patient had dose reduction of the treatment and 1 patient needed discontinuation due to panitumumab-associated stomatitis. Dermatologic AEs were the most prevalent. Clinical improvement was obtained with topical corticosteroid therapy and/or photobiomodulation. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, panitumumab-containing regimens were associated with a particular pattern of oral lesions consistent with stomatitis. This event may eventually affect the tolerability of the treatment in patients with mCRC.

The first case report of metastatic rectal adenocarcinoma to the oral vestibule in a young woman.

BACKGROUND: The available literature regarding metastasis to the oral cavity from colorectal cancer, especially rectal cancer, is currently limited. With this in mind, we aimed to report the first case of rectal adenocarcinoma metastasis to the oral vestibule. CASE REPORT: A 36-year-old Caucasian female with a 17-months history of rectal adenocarcinoma and several metastases was referred to the Dental Oncology Service due to a nodular swelling in the oral cavity. Intraoral examination showed a large, painless nodule with superficial necrosis on the right side of the mandibular vestibule. An incisional biopsy was performed, and the microscopic analysis demonstrated an infiltrative tumor characterized by islands of malignant epithelial cells with a columnar appearance and tubular pattern. The epithelial component presented pseudoductal structures resemble intestinal mucosa, which exhibited intraluminal secretion. The neoplastic cells were immunoreactive for CDX2 and Cytokeratin 20, and negative for Cytokeratin 7. Therefore, the final diagnosis of metastatic rectal adenocarcinoma was established. Unfortunately, the patient died 23 months after the diagnosis of the primary tumor. CONCLUSION: The study highlights that metastases to the oral cavity should be considered in the differential diagnosis of large reactive lesions affecting young patients, especially in the setting of a patient history of cancer.

Are intraoral stents effective in reducing oral toxicities caused by radiotherapy? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Intraoral stents have been provided to minimize acute and chronic toxicities induced by radiotherapy, including oral mucositis, salivary changes, trismus, radiation-related caries, and osteoradionecrosis. However, a systematic review and meta-analysis is necessary to determine their effectiveness. PURPOSE: The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine the effectiveness of intraoral stent use and determine whether these prosthetic devices can reduce radiation dosage to nontargeted oral tissues and adverse effects related to head and neck radiation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Two independent reviewers made a systematic search for articles published from January 2010 to March 2020 in 3 databases, supplemented by a manual search. Studies were included if they were clinical trials (randomized controlled trials, both prospective and retrospective), published in English, and evaluated radiation dose and oral adverse side effects (acute or chronic) induced by radiotherapy of participants with and without intraoral stents. RESULTS: The search strategy identified 201 studies; of which, 9 were included. A total of 251 participants were evaluated; of whom, 168 (77.3%) used intraoral stents and 57 (22.7%) were treated with radiotherapy without a prosthetic device. A statistically significant difference was found regarding the use of intraoral stents for preventing oral mucositis (P<.001), salivary changes (P=.003), and trismus (P<.02). A funnel plot showed asymmetry among the differences of means in all selected studies. CONCLUSIONS: Intraoral stents have a positive effect on preventing oral mucositis. Further clinical trials are needed to address the flaws identified in the present systematic review.

Management of intraoral stents for radiotherapy during COVID-19 pandemic.

Radiotherapy is being performed in many situations as a curative approach for head and neck cancer instead of surgery due to the current novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic. A recent publication reported that even hypofractionation was being conducted in order to reduce the daily exposure of both patients and the medical staff involved in cancer therapies. As a result, dental teams may be requested more frequently than usual to fabricate intraoral stents (IOS). Given that IOS may be a potential source of COVID-19 contagion, the main purpose of the present correspondence is to offer a guide on how health professionals may be safely presented in the room, on the management of the IOS and also how to sanitize the stents.

Radiation-related caries: current diagnostic, prognostic, and management paradigms.

OBJECTIVE AND STUDY DESIGN: This narrative review summarizes the current state of art of radiation-related caries (RC), an aggressive disease that affects approximately 30% of post-head and neck radiotherapy (HNRT) patients. RESULTS: RC mainly affects the tooth cervical areas and incisal/cuspal tips and develops 6 to 12 months after HNRT. Early RC signs include black/brownish tooth discoloration and enamel cracks, which progress to enamel delamination, exposing underlying dentin to a highly cariogenic oral environment and rapid tooth destruction/dental crown amputation. As RC advances and renders the tooth nonrestorable, it may lead to osteoradionecrosis spontaneously or upon extraction if the tooth is in a highly irradiated field of the oral cavity. This requires aggressive treatment, which would have a negative impact on a cancer survivor's quality of life and contribute to the incremental cost of cancer care. Chlorhexidine mouth rinses and topical fluoride applications are effective agents used in RC prevention; however, there are no well-established treatment protocols. Once RC progresses, dental restorations should be performed with adhesive materials in association with systematic fluoride application as illustrated in the clinical case presented in this review. Post-HNRT patients should be closely followed up for optimal RC prevention, early diagnosis, and prompt treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Future clinical studies are necessary to establish a contemporary, clinically validated protocol for RC management.

Dental treatment needs in hospitalized cancer patients: a retrospective cohort study.

PURPOSE: The objectives of this study were to describe the distribution and the clinicopathological features of the most common causes for dental treatment needs during the hospitalization of cancer patients. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of 2664 hospitalized cancer patients that analyzed the main dental treatment needs and dental procedures performed from January 2010 to December 2017. RESULTS: A total of 2664 medical patients were included in this study. Non-Hodgkin lymphoma (17.2%) was the most common cancer type, followed by leukemia (14.8%), and oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (10.5%). The most common reasons for patients' hospitalization were chemotherapy protocols (18.8%), monitoring head and neck surgeries (9.7%), and febrile neutropenia (9.6%). The main motivation for the medical team to request dental evaluation was oral mucositis (22.8%) followed by oral pain or toothache (10.8%) and fungal, viral oral infections or traumatic oral lesions (9.9%). The dental treatment needs most observed were pain due to oral mucositis (17%), dental treatment prior to radiotherapy (RT), chemotherapy (CT) or bisphosphonate therapy (BP) (10.8%), teeth extractions (6.5%), and prophylactic photobiomodulation therapy (6.3%), whereas the most common dental treatments performed were oral hygiene protocols (30.2%), photobiomodulation therapy (prophylactic and curative) (21.7%), and dental treatment prior to cancer treatment initiation (RT, CT, and BP) (9.5%). CONCLUSION: This study can be considered original in the oncologic context, providing new information about the most frequent dental treatment needs among a large population of hospitalized cancer patients.

A systematic comparison of bar-clips versus magnets.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Currently, which type of suprastructure is preferred when fabricating implant-retained craniofacial prostheses is unknown. PURPOSE: The purpose of this systematic review was to identify the best retention system (bar-clips versus magnets) for implant-retained craniofacial prostheses. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This systematic review was conducted and reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. A systematic search of Medline/PubMed and Web of Science databases for clinical trials was conducted on implant-retained craniofacial prostheses published between 2005 and 2015. English-language studies that directly compared different types of retention systems or presented information on implant survival, periimplant soft tissue reactions, and prosthetic complications were included. Nonclinical studies were excluded to eliminate bias. RESULTS: A total to 173 studies were identified, of which 10 satisfied the inclusion criteria. In total, 492 participants were included in these studies. Four selected studies displayed detailed information with regard to the number of implant failures according to the retention system. As reported, 29 (18.2%) of 159 implants with magnets failed, whereas 25 (31.6%) of 79 implants with bars failed. Overall auricular superstructures showed the highest survival (99.08%). In addition, 55.4% of all participants in the selected studies showed grade 0 of periimplant soft tissue reactions. CONCLUSIONS: A systematic search for clinical studies resulted in few studies with a short-term follow-up and small number of participants. The limited data collected indicated that magnets show fewer complications than bar superstructures; however, no hard conclusions could be drawn. Further research, preferably in the form of clinical trials, is needed to validate these findings.

Obturator prostheses versus free tissue transfers: A systematic review of the optimal approach to improving the quality of life for patients with maxillary defects.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Patient perspectives on the treatment options for maxillary defects, which include free tissue transfers or obturator prostheses, may help eliminate current uncertainty as to the best choice of treatment plan. PURPOSE: The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the quality of life (QoL) of patients with maxillary defects who had undergone restoration with obturator prostheses and/or free tissue transfers. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A systematic search of Medline/PubMed and Web of Science databases for articles published before April 2015 was performed by 2 independent reviewers. A manual search of articles published from January 2005 to March 2015 was also conducted. Studies published in English that evaluated the QoL in patients with head and neck cancers were included. The Cohen kappa method was used to calculate inter-reviewer agreement. RESULTS: Ten studies were included. The University of Washington Head and Neck Questionnaire (UW-QOL) was most commonly used to measure QoL. The majority of maxillary defects were Class IIa-b. Two studies reported that the global QoL for patients with obturator prostheses is equivalent to or even better than that of other chronic disease populations. One study revealed no significant difference in QoL when the 2 treatment options were compared. CONCLUSIONS: The limited data indicate that the QoL of patients treated with obturator prostheses and that of patients free of tumors is similar. Well-designed clinical studies are necessary to draw definitive conclusions about how obturator prostheses compare with free tissue transfers in terms of affecting patient QoL.

Emergency Dental Treatment of a Patient With Sturge-Weber Syndrome.

The Sturge-Weber (SWS) syndrome is a rare condition with congenital capillary malformations. Hemorrhages may occur on dental treatment, which can have a dramatic effect on a patient's vital sign. The aim of the present brief clinical study was to briefly report a case of a female patient with SWS who underwent an endodontic treatment. A 25-year-old patient (C.O.B.S.) with SWS and vascular malformation in cervicofacial right region was admitted to the dental clinic with pulsatile pain in tooth 16. An emergency dental treatment with cavity preparation and access to root canals was performed with intraligamentary and intrapulpal anesthesia with 3% prilocain 3% with felypressin 0.03 UI/mL because the tooth was located in the region of the vascular malformation, and any surgical treatment could lead to hemorrhages. After 7 days, the patient was recalled with the absence of painful symptoms. The endodontic treatment in patients with SWS is feasible, and safety should be an alternative to surgical treatments.